Hetzner vs Contabo: budget VPS compared
By CloudCostly editorial team Published July 3, 2026 Updated July 12, 2026
Hetzner and Contabo are the two names that come up again and again when people search for a genuinely cheap virtual private server. Both are German companies, both undercut the big clouds by a wide margin, and both attract a loyal following of developers who like to self host. Yet they compete in very different ways, and picking the wrong one can cost you performance, sanity, or money.
This guide breaks down how the two providers stack up on price, hardware, network, support, and the kind of projects each one suits. The goal is to help you choose with your eyes open rather than chasing the lowest sticker price.
Hetzner vs Contabo at a glance
If you only remember one thing, remember this: Hetzner sells consistency and network quality at a low price, while Contabo sells sheer quantity of resources at a shockingly low price. Neither is a scam, and neither is premium managed hosting. They are unmanaged infrastructure aimed at people comfortable with a root login.
| Feature | Hetzner | Contabo |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | From about 4 to 5 USD per month | From about 6 to 8 USD per month |
| Typical resources | 2 vCPU, 4GB RAM, 40GB disk | 4 vCPU, 8GB RAM, 200GB disk |
| Included traffic | 20TB on most cloud plans | 32TB, but throughput varies |
| Storage | Fast NVMe SSD | NVMe or SSD, very large |
| Standout | Consistent network, ARM options | Huge RAM and storage per dollar |
| Best for | Latency sensitive, reliable web apps | Resource hungry, budget projects |
You can dig into the raw specifications side by side on our Hetzner vs Contabo comparison page, or browse the full providers directory if you want to weigh other budget hosts too.
Pricing philosophy
Hetzner keeps its entry pricing famously low. A small shared vCPU cloud instance with a couple of gigabytes of RAM can cost less than the price of a coffee each month, and the pricing is transparent with no surprise egress fees inside the generous traffic cap. When you do exceed the included 20TB, the overage charge is modest and predictable.
Contabo takes a different approach. Its headline is the amount of RAM, vCPU, and disk you get for the money. For roughly the price of a mid tier Hetzner plan you can often double the RAM and quadruple the storage. That is genuinely hard to beat on paper. The catch is that Contabo sometimes adds one time setup fees on certain configurations and regions, so read the checkout total carefully rather than trusting the monthly figure alone.
To model real monthly costs across sizes and regions, plug the plans into our cloud cost calculator. It helps you see past the marketing number to what you will actually pay.
Hardware and raw performance
On the CPU side, Hetzner offers both shared and dedicated vCPU lines, plus its ARM based CAX instances built on Ampere processors. The dedicated vCPU plans give you steady, uncontended cores that behave predictably under sustained load, which matters for databases and build servers. The shared plans are excellent value for bursty web traffic.
Contabo leans into big numbers. Its standard VPS plans hand you generous core counts and large amounts of RAM, backed by NVMe or standard SSD storage depending on the tier. For workloads that are memory bound, such as running many containers, a self hosted analytics stack, or several game servers, Contabo can feel like a bargain. The trade off is that Contabo cores are typically shared and can show more variance under heavy multi tenant load.
- Choose Hetzner dedicated vCPU when you need steady single thread performance.
- Choose Hetzner ARM (CAX) for cheap, efficient container and CI workloads.
- Choose Contabo when you want the most RAM and disk per dollar and can tolerate some variance.
Network and bandwidth
This is where the two diverge most. Hetzner runs a mature, well peered network across its data centers, and the 20TB of included traffic on most cloud plans is generous for the price. Real world throughput is stable, and the company is transparent about its limits.
Contabo advertises even higher traffic allowances, but the practical throughput can vary depending on the data center and the time of day. Many users report perfectly good speeds, while others hit slower periods. For a typical WordPress site, an internal tool, or a hobby project, this is rarely a dealbreaker. For latency sensitive services or anything where consistent bandwidth is the whole point, Hetzner is the safer bet.
Data center locations
Hetzner operates data centers in Germany, Finland, and the United States (Ashburn and Hillsboro), which gives European and North American users solid latency options. Contabo has a wider spread of locations including Europe, the United States, Asia, and Australia, which can be useful if your audience sits far from central Europe. If global reach matters more than peak consistency, Contabo has an edge here.
Support experience
Both hosts are unmanaged, so you are expected to administer your own server. Within that reality, Hetzner offers responsive email and ticket support and a clean, useful knowledge base. Problems tend to get acknowledged quickly.
Contabo support is functional but generally slower. Ticket replies can take longer, and complex issues may need a few rounds of back and forth. If you are the kind of user who solves most problems with a search engine and a terminal, this will not bother you. If you want hand holding, neither host is really built for that, and you may prefer a managed layer. Our guide on managed versus unmanaged hosting unpacks that decision in detail.
Ease of setup and control panel
Hetzner Cloud has a clean, modern control panel with snapshots, firewalls, floating IPs, private networks, and a straightforward API. Provisioning a server takes seconds, and the whole experience feels polished for a budget provider. There is also a well maintained command line tool and Terraform support for infrastructure as code fans.
Contabo has improved its control panel considerably, but it still feels more basic. You get the essentials, such as reinstall, VNC access, and snapshots, though the workflow is less slick than Hetzner. Power users will not struggle, but the day to day polish clearly favors Hetzner.
Reliability and uptime
Both providers deliver reliable uptime for the price bracket, but Hetzner has the stronger reputation for stability and clear incident communication. Contabo is dependable enough for most projects, yet you should always run your own backups regardless of provider. Cheap VPS hosting means you own the resilience story, so snapshot regularly and keep off site copies of anything you cannot lose.
Security and add ons
Hetzner includes free firewalls, private networking, and optional backups and snapshots at low cost. Its ecosystem of features around the core VPS is more complete. Contabo covers the basics and offers add ons like additional storage and object storage, but the surrounding tooling is thinner. For teams that want to build a small private network of servers with sensible defaults, Hetzner is easier to work with.
Who should choose Hetzner
Hetzner is the right pick if you want a dependable, fast, and cheap server with a great control panel and consistent network. It suits production web apps, APIs, small databases, staging environments, and anyone who values predictability. The ARM instances are a hidden gem for cost conscious container workloads. If your users are in Europe or North America, latency will be excellent. Explore the full lineup on the Hetzner provider page.
Who should choose Contabo
Contabo is the right pick when your project is hungry for RAM and storage and your budget is tight. Think self hosted media servers, memory heavy application stacks, several small game servers, or lab environments where raw capacity beats guaranteed throughput. As long as you can tolerate variable network speed and slower support, the value is hard to argue with. See the details on the Contabo provider page, and if pure price is your obsession, our roundup of the cheapest VPS providers is worth a read.
Network quality and reliability
Beyond raw specs, the two differ in network experience. Hetzner is known for a well-connected, reliable network and consistent performance, backed by its own data centres in Germany and Finland plus a US location. Contabo delivers extraordinary specs for the price but has a mixed reputation for network throughput and support responsiveness, which is the trade-off for its low prices. If steady, predictable performance matters, Hetzner is the safer pick; if you want the absolute most RAM and CPU per dollar and can tolerate some variability, Contabo is compelling. Read the notes on each provider page before deciding.
Which should you choose
Choose Hetzner if you want a dependable, well-rounded budget host with generous traffic, good hardware and cheap ARM options, and you are in or near Europe. Choose Contabo if your priority is maximum raw resources for the lowest possible price, and you are comfortable trading some network consistency and support speed for that value. Both are excellent value compared with mainstream clouds, so this is a choice between two strong budget options rather than a good one and a bad one. See how they rank against everything else on our value-ranked plans.
Conclusion
Hetzner and Contabo both destroy the pricing of the mainstream clouds, but they are not interchangeable. Hetzner wins on network consistency, control panel polish, ARM options, and support responsiveness. Contabo wins on the sheer volume of RAM, CPU, and disk you get for each dollar. Match the host to the workload rather than the sticker price, and either one can serve you brilliantly. Ready to decide? Compare live specs and prices on our Hetzner vs Contabo page, or line them up against everyone else in the plans listing.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hetzner or Contabo cheaper?
Contabo usually wins on raw resources per dollar, packing more RAM, vCPU, and disk into a low monthly price. Hetzner is cheaper at the entry level and includes far more traffic, so the better value depends on whether you need heavy resources or heavy bandwidth.
Which one has better network performance?
Hetzner has a more consistent, well peered network with 20TB of included traffic on most plans. Contabo network throughput can vary by location and time of day, though it is usually fine for typical web workloads.
Does Hetzner offer ARM servers?
Yes. Hetzner sells Ampere based ARM cloud instances (the CAX line) that are very cheap and power efficient, which is great for containers, CI runners, and lightweight web apps that can run on ARM.
Is Contabo good for production workloads?
Contabo can run production sites well when you value large amounts of RAM and storage over guaranteed network speed and fast support. For latency sensitive or mission critical apps, Hetzner or a managed host is often the safer pick.
How fast is support at each provider?
Hetzner offers responsive email and ticket support and solid documentation. Contabo support is functional but generally slower to respond, so self sufficient users tend to be happiest there.